Re: Important info about developing on win95 and deploying web forms on solaris

From: Oracle Enterprise Internet Tools Product Management <no_replies_at_uk.oracle.com>
Date: 2000/02/17
Message-ID: <88h5q0$3mu$1_at_inet16.us.oracle.com>#1/1


Do you have a bug number for this ?

--
Regards

Jason

____________________________________________________________________________
__

  Jason Pepper - Enterprise Internet Tools Product Management
____________________________________________________________________________
__

Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle Corporation

Guy Dallaire <gdallair_at_criq.qc.ca> wrote in message
news:38a30844.76139302_at_news.risq.qc.ca...

> Hi to all,
>
> I just wanted to tell everybody here that if you are developing on
> windows 95 or NT and then deploy on solaris with web forms, you might
> have big problems with the way your forms look like once deployed on
> the web.
>
> Here is what we used to do:
>
> a) Design under win95, test in client server
> b) ftp (binary) the .fmb to the solaris server
> c) Regenerate the forms from the command line using f60gen in BATCH
> mode from a telnet session (terminal emulatuion, NO X windows)
> d) Test with a web browser
>
> We had A LOT of display and fonts ans sizing problems with the forms
> back then. We then discovered that the problems were not related to
> java at all as we taught they were ! The problem is with the f60gen
> utility from oracle which is not linked with the correct toolkit ! It
> is different than f60desm (designed to run under X windows)
>
> That will only be fixed on developper 6i (At least that's what THEY
> say, but you know THEM !)
>
> WorkAround/Fix:
>
> generate your forms with f60desm in batch mode or open
> the .fmb on solaris with f60desm and generate on solaris. You'll need
> an X terminal or an X terminal emulator to do this, even if you use
> BATCH mode.
>
> Hope this will help people
>
> P.S.: This is also true for developer server 2.1 (repacce f60... by
> f50...)
Received on Thu Feb 17 2000 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message