Re: What is better, ODBC or OO4O?

From: Michel Cadot <micadot_at_netcourrier.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:55:20 +0100
Message-ID: <820kvm$2hqom$1_at_oceanite.cybercable.fr>


Sorry, the URL in my previous answer no more exists.

You can see at the following URL:

http://technet.oracle.com/doc/server.815/a68003/01_19obj.htm
http://technet.oracle.com/doc/server.815/a68003/01_01dev.htm
These are documentations and don't compare ODBC and OO4O.

I have a paper but in french, ask me if you are interested.

--
Regards
Michel


Michel Cadot <micadot_at_netcourrier.com> a écrit dans le message :
820jie$2hfot$1_at_oceanite.cybercable.fr...

> If you use only Oracle as database server, OO4O is surely the best choice
> for its performances and its functionnalities.
>
> You can get an Oracle white paper at URL:
> http://www.oracle.com/database/features/oo4o/html/oo4owp.html
>
>
> --
> Have a nice day
> Michel
>
>
> Wouter <wsh_at_xs3.xs4all.nl> a écrit dans le message :
> 820htm$4jc$1_at_news1.xs4all.nl...
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are migrating from Sybase to Oracle. Our NT applications use ADO (with
> odbc).
> > However we're having problems with ODBC and Oracle: Stored procedures with a
> ref
> > cursor as input or output parameter is only supported if the stored
procedure
> > is defined in a package. The only ODBC driver that does not have this
> limitation
> > is the one from intersolve (merant), however this driver is very expensive.
> >
> > So we are looking at alternatives, and we would like to know if anybody has
> any
> > experience with OO4O, compared to ODBC (with ADO). I don't see much about
OO4O
> > in newsgroups, is this because 0040 is perfect, or because is sucks?
> >
> > We want to use it for multitier (and multithreaded) applications.
> >
> > Any advice or pointer to information about the subject is welcome!
> >
> > Thanks, Wouter
> >
> > --
> > wsh_at_xs4all.nl
> >
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 30 1999 - 14:55:20 CET

Original text of this message