Re: What is better, ODBC or OO4O?
From: Michel Cadot <micadot_at_netcourrier.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:31:20 +0100
Message-ID: <820jie$2hfot$1_at_oceanite.cybercable.fr>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:31:20 +0100
Message-ID: <820jie$2hfot$1_at_oceanite.cybercable.fr>
[Quoted] [Quoted] If you use only Oracle as database server, OO4O is surely the best choice for its performances and its functionnalities.
You can get an Oracle white paper at URL: http://www.oracle.com/database/features/oo4o/html/oo4owp.html
-- Have a nice day Michel Wouter <wsh_at_xs3.xs4all.nl> a écrit dans le message : 820htm$4jc$1_at_news1.xs4all.nl...Received on Tue Nov 30 1999 - 14:31:20 CET
> Hello,
>
> We are migrating from Sybase to Oracle. Our NT applications use ADO (with
odbc).
> However we're having problems with ODBC and Oracle: Stored procedures with a
ref
> cursor as input or output parameter is only supported if the stored procedure
> is defined in a package. The only ODBC driver that does not have this
limitation
> is the one from intersolve (merant), however this driver is very expensive.
>
> So we are looking at alternatives, and we would like to know if anybody has
any
> experience with OO4O, compared to ODBC (with ADO). I don't see much about OO4O
> in newsgroups, is this because 0040 is perfect, or because is sucks?
>
> We want to use it for multitier (and multithreaded) applications.
>
> Any advice or pointer to information about the subject is welcome!
>
> Thanks, Wouter
>
> --
> wsh_at_xs4all.nl
>