Re: RDF files v REP files

From: Connor McDonald <connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 17:35:28 +0800
Message-ID: <383276E0.1DA4_at_yahoo.com>


Robert sharpe wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Can some one please settle this arguement that we have between 2 of
> our contractors - we are developing in Forms 4.5 and Reports 2.5 16 bit
> under Windows 95, and we have a difference of opinion with our 2
> contractors. One says that we should release only the .RDF files to
> run against Oracle runtime, the other one says we should generate them
> and release the .REP files.
> Can some one give me their neutral opinion as to what is the best
> method as even I'm getting confused now.
>
> Thanks bob.....
>
> * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
> The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

The REP files have some bits stripped out of them and are thus smaller...This could significant in an environment where the REP's are stored centrally and are thus accessed via a network...

-- 
===========================================
Connor McDonald
"These views mine, no-one elses etc etc"
connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com

"Some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue."
Received on Wed Nov 17 1999 - 10:35:28 CET

Original text of this message