Re: Developer 1.3.2 and 2.1 in same PC Oracle Home?

What about 1.6.1 and 2.1. Have not been able to get the two to live together. Do you have an exact procedure for the install? Thanks

Steve Cosner <stevec_at_zimmer.csufresno.edu> wrote in message news:3Soy3.154$tS.6431_at_nntp.csufresno.edu...
> This is the only way that I know of that is supposed to work. I don't
> know if it is documented anywhere (I would contact Oracle), but ever
> since Forms 5.0 came out, this is the method required to get the two
> versions to work.
>
> To get the versions to work from different Oracle homes would require
> messing with different versions of the PC's Registry. I think that
> would be a nightmare.
>
> Steve Cosner
>
>
> In article <F8Vx3.3521$w6.87318_at_typhoon.nyroc.rr.com>,
> Louise Weiler <ljweiler_at_nycap.rr.com> wrote:
> >We currently have a number of (in house) Oracle applications that were
> >created in Developer 1.3.2 (32-bit version). All NEW applications have
to
> >be developed in Developer 2.1. We have installed Developer 2.1 "over"
the
> >top of Developer 1.3.2 (overwriting .DLL's where necessary) and it
appears
> >to be working (since February, 1999). Both environments are connecting
to
> >an Oracle 8.0.4 database. However, some of our sites are reluctant (at
> >best) to attempt this because there is no documentation supporting this
> >scenario.
> >
> >Is there any documentation supporting this scenario anywhere? Is it a
fluke
> >that this is running on our PC network? Are we going to be hosed when we
> >move to NT 4.0 for our development environment?
> >
> >Two different Oracle Homes for different versions of Developer would get
> >pretty messy pretty quick.
> >Thanks for any info.
> >Louise
> >
> >--
> >-- Louise
> >Louise J Weiler
> >Ballston Lake, NY
> >
>
>
Received on Mon Aug 30 1999 - 15:16:50 CEST