Re: Oracle #1? Then why are these still missing...

From: Dirk Bellemans <Dirk.Bellemans_at_skynet.belgium>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:57:43 +0200
Message-ID: <7otv3u$bu7$>

kevin moriarty wrote in message <7nt9eo$cd4$>...
>I'm a newbie; been doing oracle for 3 months. After using access, paradox,
>and oracle I've com to this insight: Oracle is less user friendly, much
>slower to develope in, more difficult to get information on, more expensive
>to use, pays better, and handles large tables better.

I don't agree on everything you write, but the most important is true: it pays better...

Yet, in my experience (haven't tried them all, true) Dev2K is by far the best 4GL available for ordinary business oriented custom development: it is fast, can do almost everything, you can find a collegue with (more) experience and it is easy to write well maintainable code. Can't tell all of that about the competition, IMO.

Dirk Bellemans
Modify email address to reply (use .be instead of .belgium)
Received on Thu Aug 12 1999 - 09:57:43 CEST

Original text of this message