RAW vs. Std. FileSystem

From: Rowan McCammon <rowan_mccammon_at_amp.com.au>
Date: 1998/11/24
Message-ID: <365B3E52.7FC54EFB_at_amp.com.au>#1/1

Hi All,

A couple of questions.

Is it true that most of the worlds VLDBs use RAW devices to store the physical files?
Does Oracle recommend RAW devices for VLDBs?

Any input welcome.

Regards,
Rowan.

--
The opinions expressed are mine and not of my company.

Received on Tue Nov 24 1998 - 00:00:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Oracle: "Re: RAW vs. Std. FileSystem"
Previous message: KeyStroke (Jack L. Swayze Sr.): "Re: A SQL question, please help..."
Next in thread: Oracle: "Re: RAW vs. Std. FileSystem"
Reply: Oracle: "Re: RAW vs. Std. FileSystem"
Maybe reply: Sean Fitzgerald: "Re: RAW vs. Std. FileSystem"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message