Re: How to handle different Forms 4.5 sub-versions?

From: DanHW <danhw_at_aol.com>
Date: 1998/02/07
Message-ID: <19980207060201.BAA09165_at_ladder03.news.aol.com>#1/1


>rstyles wrote:
>> Our site is new to Oracle development and support and we have a
>> scenario where package A, package B and our own application development
>> may be using different sub-versions of Forms 4.5. What do other sites
>> do in this case?
>> a) recompile all forms and standardise on one version
>> b) use the highest version and don't recompile the forms
>> c) use all three versions
>
>(b) is the best option. There's no convenient way to use three versions
>unless you separate them on different machines. You shouldn't need to
>recompile the modules between different sub-versions, but if you're
>going to roll out on the latest stuff (D2K r1.6, for example), you may
>want to do it once just to be safe.
>
>-Stacy
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>stacy *underscore* friedman *at* yahoo *dot* com
>(or replace yahoo.dot.com with yahoo.com)
>Spam bait: billg_at_microsoft.com root_at_localhost
>
>
It has been my experience that going from 1.3.2 to 1.5.1 does require a recompilation (WinNT), but otherwise I agree with Stacy.

Dan Received on Sat Feb 07 1998 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message