Re: SQL*Net 16 bits and SQL*Net 32 bits on the same PC

From: Jomarlen <jomarlen_at_aol.com>
Date: 1997/09/23
Message-ID: <19970923173301.NAA00339_at_ladder02.news.aol.com>#1/1


I don't know what you are doing wrong, but we are running both 16 and 32 bit Dev/2k using SQL*Net with no problem. Did you try custom installations and/or non-default directory names. If so try again using the defaults.

John



John C. Lennon
Utility Partners Inc.
4300 West Tropicana Blvd LVO-UPL
Las Vegas NV 89103

FOR UTILITY PARTNERS EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITIES VISIT www.utilpart.com

e-mail: jomarlen_at_aol.com
Web Site: http://members.aol.com/jomarlen/

The views expressed in this message
are those of the author and not
necessarily those of U.P. Inc.
and/or its employees.


>Subject: Re: SQL*Net 16 bits and SQL*Net 32 bits on the same PC
>From: jcygan_at_netxpress.com (JC)
>Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 13:36:07 GMT
>Message-id: <3424d057.2567372_at_206.67.207.6>
>
>>Is there any guys out there who have experiences and/or troubles with sqlnet
 16
>>and 32 bits on the same PC??
>
>I have tried to use both on NT/Workstation. Sql-Net seems to work
>fine. The troubles I ran into is when I try to run a 16-Bit Forms
>app, I get a bunch of errors relating to DLLs loaded into the Windows
>System directory.
>
>I would have assumed that Oracle would have put these in system32 on
>NT and system for 16-Bit apps. But, I still get these errors. Oh, in
>case this helps, I installed 16-Bit first followed by the 32bit
>install.
>
>Also, if they are doing the above for NT (with the system32 directory)
>how is this situation handled in Win95?
>
>Joe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Sep 23 1997 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message