Re: DBMS_OUTPUT Hmmm.
From: Scott Urman <surman_at_dlsun338.us.oracle.com>
Date: 1997/03/18
Message-ID: <5gmovk$r53_at_inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com>#1/1
Scott Urman Oracle Corporation surman_at_us.oracle.com
Author of _Oracle PL/SQL Programming_ ISBN 0-07-882176-2 Published by Oracle Press - http://www.osborne.com/oracle/index.htm
"The opinions expressed here are my own, and are not necessarily that of Oracle Corporation"
Received on Tue Mar 18 1997 - 00:00:00 CET
Date: 1997/03/18
Message-ID: <5gmovk$r53_at_inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com>#1/1
In article <MPG.d98b0116f582d95989680_at_nsw-newshost.tpgi.com.au>, email_at_bisinfo.com.au (Brad Deveson) writes:
|> Anyone know why dbms_output wouldn't work in a piece of PL\SQL if an
|> exception occurs?
This is a SQL*Plus bug (151707). It's fixed in version 3.1.
|>
|> Regards.
Scott Urman Oracle Corporation surman_at_us.oracle.com
Author of _Oracle PL/SQL Programming_ ISBN 0-07-882176-2 Published by Oracle Press - http://www.osborne.com/oracle/index.htm
"The opinions expressed here are my own, and are not necessarily that of Oracle Corporation"
Received on Tue Mar 18 1997 - 00:00:00 CET