Re: Dev/2000 1.3 Experience?

From: Tony Quan <tquan_at_ibm.net>
Date: 1997/01/04
Message-ID: <tquan-0401971604290001_at_slip166-72-210-72.ca.us.ibm.net>#1/1


In article <ismo.852121215_at_sasu1>, ismo_at_sasu1.carelian.fi (Ismo Tuononen) wrote:

>Dan Townsend <townsend_at_ebmud.com> writes:
>
>>We have been planning to upgrade from Dev2k 1.2 to 1.3 to get away from
>>some serious bugs. Most of our clients are still Win31, so we have
>>planned to go to the 16-bit version. Oracle Support recently hinted that
>>they have received a lot of complaints about the 16-bit version still
>>being very buggy. Does anyone have experience with either the 16-bit or
>>32-bit (Win95) versions of Dev2k 1.3 that would shed some light on this?
 

>>Thanks in advance.
>>+-----------------------------------------------------
>>| Dan Townsend, Supervising Database Architect
>>| EBMUD Enterprise Object Designer
>>| voice: (510) 287-0272 fax: (510) 287-0373
>>+-----------------------------------------------------
>
>I have been using Dev2k 1.3 32-bit in Win95 now about 4 weeks, and it works
>quite fine (I believe as fine as something can work in Win95, I hope that
>they soon port Dev2k to unix).
>
>Ismo

[Quoted] Developer/2000 has always been available on UNIX. It's available on all the major UNIXes I can think of (Sun, DEC, IBM, HP, Intel-based...)

--Tony
tquan_at_ibm.net Received on Sat Jan 04 1997 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message