Re: Dev/2000 1.3 Experience?

I have been using the 32 bit version of 1.3 (Windows 95) for some 6 months, mostly with satisfaction. It's a vast improvement over 1.2 stability wise. I also had the 16 bit 1.2 co-existing happily on the same PC for compilation/test purposes.
When I upgraded the 16 bit version to 1.3.2 it messed up my 32 bit installation (Oracle support had no idea of what to do), so I had to re-install everything.
A colleague at work is still using Win31 and has recently upgraded to 1.3.2 and is mainly pleased with the result.
The moral here I think is to do your development in a 32 bit environment but keep another machine with a 16 bit environment for generating and testing executables for your Win31 clients.

Dan Townsend <townsend_at_ebmud.com> wrote in article <32C9365C.7848_at_ebmud.com>...
> We have been planning to upgrade from Dev2k 1.2 to 1.3 to get away from
> some serious bugs. Most of our clients are still Win31, so we have
> planned to go to the 16-bit version. Oracle Support recently hinted that
> they have received a lot of complaints about the 16-bit version still
> being very buggy. Does anyone have experience with either the 16-bit or
> 32-bit (Win95) versions of Dev2k 1.3 that would shed some light on this?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> +-----------------------------------------------------
> | Dan Townsend, Supervising Database Architect
> | EBMUD Enterprise Object Designer
> | voice: (510) 287-0272 fax: (510) 287-0373
> +-----------------------------------------------------
>
Received on Wed Jan 01 1997 - 00:00:00 CET