Re: Dev/2000 1.3 Experience?

[Quoted] [Quoted] Dan Townsend <townsend_at_ebmud.com> writes:

>We have been planning to upgrade from Dev2k 1.2 to 1.3 to get away from
>some serious bugs. Most of our clients are still Win31, so we have
>planned to go to the 16-bit version. Oracle Support recently hinted that
>they have received a lot of complaints about the 16-bit version still
>being very buggy. Does anyone have experience with either the 16-bit or
>32-bit (Win95) versions of Dev2k 1.3 that would shed some light on this?
 

>Thanks in advance.
>+-----------------------------------------------------
>| Dan Townsend, Supervising Database Architect
>| EBMUD Enterprise Object Designer
>| voice: (510) 287-0272 fax: (510) 287-0373
>+-----------------------------------------------------

[Quoted] [Quoted] I have been using Dev2k 1.3 32-bit in Win95 now about 4 weeks, and it works quite fine (I believe as fine as something can work in Win95, I hope that they soon port Dev2k to unix).

Ismo Received on Wed Jan 01 1997 - 00:00:00 CET