X-Received: by 10.236.203.196 with SMTP id f44mr68689194yho.15.1426847250620; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 03:27:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.79.170 with SMTP id k10mr326958igx.5.1426847250588; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 03:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Path: news.cambrium.nl!textnews.cambrium.nl!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.208.113.67.MISMATCH!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!h3no3657863qgf.1!news-out.google.com!db6ni58136igc.0!nntp.google.com!z20no2044602igj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 03:27:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=122.169.156.249; posting-account=d_LY4wkAAAB2c_KXugh7VYrgerMf7W48 NNTP-Posting-Host: 122.169.156.249 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7b2d54eb-6f8f-4e7c-809b-5efe4582e44b@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Redgate Video about incremental X-plaform backup From: Kumar Madduri Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:27:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.cambrium.nl I agree with Mladen. Logically he is right in my opinion. Just because some= one is good and has been performing brilliantly and going to perform brilli= antly does not mean they are flawless (their work especially) and if Mladen= has observed something about the presentation that made him comment, I thi= nk he has the right to do so. Also, he did not start this discussion. He wa= s only responding to a point someone made by giving a link to this presenta= tion in question. So as a person who had gone through the presentation he h= ad given his opinion.