Re: Big Data analytics with Hadoop

From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <77a01a1f-3a75-4aa3-b431-0ba7df9d8994_at_m2g2000pbv.googlegroups.com>



On Jul 13, 7:11 pm, Noons <wizofo..._at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> joel garry wrote,on my timestamp of 13/07/2012 1:46 AM:
>
> > And how much of that data is spam?  You've added to it.
>
> > Let's see, with headers your message is about 2000 characters, copied
> > to 1000's of computers all over the world.
>
> > I think that zettabyte is probably at least an order of magnitude over
> > estimated if you remove redundant data, and most of what's left is
> > useless.
>
> LOL!  Now,now Joel: you're trying to get in the way of the "next big thing"? Again?
> Man!  We'll never learn, will we?
> ROFL!
Well, I think one thing they are trying to do is data mining, separating the very small wheat from the very large chaff. Far be it for me to get in their way. It's just so far away from what I do it's hard to understand why anyone would care. But it's easy to understand: anything that is near the bottom of an s-curve in growth has a lot of exciting opportunities. Dumbass marketers and other leaches try to sell to us inappropriately. Well-proven technologies get decremented too fast. That's the thing we must fight.

Most next big things will wind up in the dustbin of technological history on their own. It's an unfortunate corollary that the best technology won't win. I revel in the Schadenfreude

jg

--
_at_home.com is bogus.
Two year coitus interruptus.  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48180815/ns/business-us_business/#.UAQ6MpHXrPh
Received on Mon Jul 16 2012 - 10:59:26 CDT

Original text of this message