Re: Old linux lore no longer applies

From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a8e94ba9-64c1-4409-8f27-189ba3047e6f_at_x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com>

On Mar 22, 2:05 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:

> The result was the same, regardless of whether I set the
> db_file_multiblock_read_count to 32,128 or 512. My brothers in arms, this
> is no longer a parameter. This brings back memories, since the time I
> have become the consultant of swing.
>
> --http://mgogala.byethost5.com

Have you looked for hidden parameters like (the 10g) _db_file_optimizer_read_count ? There could be some interaction with these and system statistics or whatever, rather than hardcoding.

Now that OL6 is cert'd, there may be more easter eggs.

jg

--
_at_home.com is bogus.
You know how to whistle?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-22/oracle-investor-sues-over-200-million-whistle-blower-accord.html

Received on Thu Mar 22 2012 - 16:42:58 CDT