Re: Order entry service available
From: Eric <eric_at_deptj.eu>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:13:03 +0000
Message-ID: <slrnjjglcf.joe.eric_at_teckel.deptj.eu>
On 2012-02-12, ddf <oratune_at_msn.com> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 9:27?am, Eric <e..._at_deptj.eu> wrote:
>> On 2012-02-10, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Feb 9, 11:11?pm, vikram <kingkon..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
<spam snipped>
>>
>> > This is the wrong place to post your SPAM. ?Remove it immediately.
>>
>> Are you really so naive as to believe either that he would want to
>> remove it or that there is actually any way for him to do so?
>>
>
> No, however it is common policy to post such notifications regardless
> of the integrity of the original poster.
>
> I'm surprised you haven't noticed that.
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:13:03 +0000
Message-ID: <slrnjjglcf.joe.eric_at_teckel.deptj.eu>
On 2012-02-12, ddf <oratune_at_msn.com> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 9:27?am, Eric <e..._at_deptj.eu> wrote:
>> On 2012-02-10, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Feb 9, 11:11?pm, vikram <kingkon..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
<spam snipped>
>>
>> > This is the wrong place to post your SPAM. ?Remove it immediately.
>>
>> Are you really so naive as to believe either that he would want to
>> remove it or that there is actually any way for him to do so?
>>
>
> No, however it is common policy to post such notifications regardless
> of the integrity of the original poster.
>
> I'm surprised you haven't noticed that.
I have, but I consider it to be moderately pointless.
Asking for removal is definitely pointless since it is, as I said, impossible.
Regards,
Eric
-- ms fnd in a lbryReceived on Sun Feb 12 2012 - 18:13:03 CST