Re: Sorry, but...
From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:10:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <0a151844-dd36-4662-9d3e-febbf4029064_at_o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
On Jan 10, 8:59 am, "Gerard H. Pille" <g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:10:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <0a151844-dd36-4662-9d3e-febbf4029064_at_o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
On Jan 10, 8:59 am, "Gerard H. Pille" <g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
> But, as you can see, even OP company is looking to reduce costs. Maybe private health insurance
> is no longer the milk-cow it used to be?
+1!
> "I wish Oracle allowed me to have multiple undo tablespaces". With RAC, each instance can have
> its own undo. Would that help you? Why would you like to have separate undo?
Separate, control and contain the I/O loads. Without RAC. I can't afford it! ;-) Received on Mon Jan 09 2012 - 20:10:56 CST