Re: Ding dong, the wicked witch is dead!
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:19:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8525b4b4-42c1-4a6f-aaf5-62c1efca3677_at_s10g2000prj.googlegroups.com>
On Dec 28, 7:35 am, Mark D Powell <Mark.Powe..._at_hp.com> wrote:
> On Dec 27, 6:58 pm, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 27, 3:14 pm, Noons <wizofo..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 25, 1:51 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Why do I sense another development monstrosity?
>
> > > > Nuno, why do I sense the lack of optimism?
>
> > > Narh. More like total lack of patience to put up with Oracle
> > > development's nonsense.
>
> > Oh, here's why I didn't get the email:
>
> > "You are receiving this email because you are a My Oracle Support user
> > who has recently logged into the HTML-based interface. " Fine print
> > at the bottom: http://www.oracle.com/us/dm/100035303-wwsu11104830mpp001-oem-1430133....
>
> > That's what I get for being a good 2.0 and using the flash version.
> > Where "flash" is a synonym for "vomit."
>
> > jg
> > --
> > _at_home.com is bogus.
> > "Oracle executives blamed the shortfall on weaknesses in the company’s
> > management of its own sales processes."http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/b3902b8a-2cec-11e1-b485-00144feabdc0.h...
>
> As a regular user of the current flash based Support and Community
> environments I note that the current flash version is much faster than
> the initial release and now provides multiple posting font types and
> sizes. The initial log on is still too slow but at least it does not
> hang on a regular basis like in the early days.
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:19:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8525b4b4-42c1-4a6f-aaf5-62c1efca3677_at_s10g2000prj.googlegroups.com>
On Dec 28, 7:35 am, Mark D Powell <Mark.Powe..._at_hp.com> wrote:
> On Dec 27, 6:58 pm, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 27, 3:14 pm, Noons <wizofo..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 25, 1:51 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Why do I sense another development monstrosity?
>
> > > > Nuno, why do I sense the lack of optimism?
>
> > > Narh. More like total lack of patience to put up with Oracle
> > > development's nonsense.
>
> > Oh, here's why I didn't get the email:
>
> > "You are receiving this email because you are a My Oracle Support user
> > who has recently logged into the HTML-based interface. " Fine print
> > at the bottom: http://www.oracle.com/us/dm/100035303-wwsu11104830mpp001-oem-1430133....
>
> > That's what I get for being a good 2.0 and using the flash version.
> > Where "flash" is a synonym for "vomit."
>
> > jg
> > --
> > _at_home.com is bogus.
> > "Oracle executives blamed the shortfall on weaknesses in the company’s
> > management of its own sales processes."http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/b3902b8a-2cec-11e1-b485-00144feabdc0.h...
>
> As a regular user of the current flash based Support and Community
> environments I note that the current flash version is much faster than
> the initial release and now provides multiple posting font types and
> sizes. The initial log on is still too slow but at least it does not
> hang on a regular basis like in the early days.
Mark, you do an amazing job in all the communities you participate in. I find it tough to go back to something that has repeatedly dinged me, so I'm on the flash support every day, but hardly ever even look at the communities.
>
> Now if the support team could just fix the search feature by properly
> identifing the correct key words for the aricles and notes that
> support produces!
>
They definitely could do better about allowing users to set some global search parameters so we could avoid all the newfangled stuff that's been merged in. When it gives a filtering popup, it makes me choose an edition, when I just want to filter to Oracle db hits, which I find kind of silly.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. Maybe I'm old fashioned, but somehow deduping backups strikes me as insanely stupid. http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/whitepaper/Business-Intelligence/Databases/peak-protection-for-oracle-database-workloads-wp1325029590?articleID=191703989Received on Wed Dec 28 2011 - 11:19:57 CST