Re: Should one include partitioning key column as first column of non-unique local index

From: vsevolod afanassiev <vsevolod.afanassiev_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 00:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1e523e01-048b-4d05-b046-d9e77aeb986f_at_v42g2000pri.googlegroups.com>

I think Oracle doesn't allow compression of partitioned indexes Received on Mon Aug 15 2011 - 02:51:34 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Robert Klemme: "Re: Should one include partitioning key column as first column of non-unique local index"
Previous message: Jack Schmidt: "Re: Question about External Tables"
Maybe in reply to: vsevolod afanassiev: "Should one include partitioning key column as first column of non-unique local index"
Next in thread: Robert Klemme: "Re: Should one include partitioning key column as first column of non-unique local index"
Reply: Robert Klemme: "Re: Should one include partitioning key column as first column of non-unique local index"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message