Re: SCAN address
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <14e9f8ff-0e4f-4980-895f-ea21bde06f9d_at_b11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
On Aug 10, 4:02 pm, onedbguru <onedbg..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> as for the "infuriating" , have you not heard of DBA2.0. If you are
> not a DBA 2.0, you need to work in that direction. DBA2.0 is a SYS/
> NET/SAN/DB Admin all rolled into one... Not to mention that being a
> DBA2.0, you really start to understand the "system" not just our
> little world of databases.
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <14e9f8ff-0e4f-4980-895f-ea21bde06f9d_at_b11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
On Aug 10, 4:02 pm, onedbguru <onedbg..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> as for the "infuriating" , have you not heard of DBA2.0. If you are
> not a DBA 2.0, you need to work in that direction. DBA2.0 is a SYS/
> NET/SAN/DB Admin all rolled into one... Not to mention that being a
> DBA2.0, you really start to understand the "system" not just our
> little world of databases.
DBA 2.0 is so 2006.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. Or 2001 http://www-personal.umich.edu/~beattie/dba/dbarrev.htmlReceived on Thu Aug 11 2011 - 10:44:29 CDT