Re: Comparing Top 5 Timed Events and Cache Advisory
From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:08:22 +1000
Message-ID: <itksc6$ndc$1_at_dont-email.me>
Mladen Gogala wrote,on my timestamp of 18/06/2011 10:58 AM:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:45:31 +1000, Noons wrote:
>
>> Why didn't you tell us indexes are slow?".
>
> Love that stuff. Indexes are slow? Where are they moving to?
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:08:22 +1000
Message-ID: <itksc6$ndc$1_at_dont-email.me>
Mladen Gogala wrote,on my timestamp of 18/06/2011 10:58 AM:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:45:31 +1000, Noons wrote:
>
>> Why didn't you tell us indexes are slow?".
>
> Love that stuff. Indexes are slow? Where are they moving to?
LOL! Amazing how these things start, isn't it? A bunch of partitioned tables make a few batch jobs run faster when using only the partition key or a local prefixed index and all of a sudden, "all" indexes are slow! :D Received on Sun Jun 19 2011 - 08:08:22 CDT