Re: Do we need multiple REDOLOG member if it is already on SAN box?

From: joel garry <>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:16:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>

On May 4, 3:00 am, Noons <> wrote:
> joel garry wrote,on my timestamp of 4/05/2011 2:08 AM:

> LOL!   Lies, damn lies and "nuke stats"?

LOL! Still can't find the gigantic article from the newspaper (they seem to make it difficult if you don't pay the extra $1 per month to join the club that can see an online edition just like the print edition), but a brief poke about the tubes found this interesting chunk (see page 32145):

Contrast to this:


-- is bogus.
Oh _that_ guy:!/ReallyVirtual/status/64912440353234944
Received on Wed May 04 2011 - 11:16:58 CDT

Original text of this message