Re: Do we need multiple REDOLOG member if it is already on SAN box?
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:16:58 -0700 (PDT)
On May 4, 3:00 am, Noons <wizofo..._at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> joel garry wrote,on my timestamp of 4/05/2011 2:08 AM:
> LOL! Lies, damn lies and "nuke stats"?
LOL! Still can't find the gigantic article from the newspaper (they seem to make it difficult if you don't pay the extra $1 per month to join the club that can see an online edition just like the print edition), but a brief poke about the tubes found this interesting chunk (see page 32145): http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0037/ML003711521.pdf
-- _at_home.com is bogus. Oh _that_ guy: http://twitter.com/#!/ReallyVirtual/status/64912440353234944Received on Wed May 04 2011 - 11:16:58 CDT