Re: 10.2.0.1 trace uncommitted inserts
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:10:58 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2011.04.30.04.10.58_at_gmail.com>
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:00:01 -0700, John Hurley wrote:
> The original poster does not apparently know about setting a 10046
> trace. More than one person implicated in not having the ability to
> figure out what is going on at least in my mind.
10046 trace has nothing to do with the problem. The original problem, at
least according to what I have read, is that the application log contains
the record of the transaction while the table doesn't. If that is a usual
3-tier application with an application server, client and a DB server,
tracing it will not be trivial as it may include many sessions that are
unrelated to the problem. If the vendor "cannot figure out what's
happening", the vendor is extremely unlikely to be using
DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO. The best bet is a trigger with an autonomous
transaction which will show what was fired and when. That is called
"debugging" and is usually done by the people who write the application.
If they are unable to do so, which is what the OP implied, then they are
not very competent, period.
Furthermore, your sanctimonious "I'm holier than thou" attitude is
beginning to bore the heck out of me, so I ignore majority of your posts.
You can shove your crystal ball where the sun doesn't shine.
-- http://mgogala.byethost5.comReceived on Fri Apr 29 2011 - 23:10:58 CDT