Re: 10.2.0.1 trace uncommitted inserts

From: John Hurley <hurleyjohnb_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <cd6cae87-02a4-4897-b4c6-c95c5cb98507_at_s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>

On Apr 29, 4:15 pm, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 12:47 pm, John Hurley <hurleyjo..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Mladen:
>
> > # Now this looks like an intelligent design! There are entities called
> > "triggers" which can be made to fire on insert.
>
> > ...
>
> > So you have already been able to look inside from the little material
> > supplied by the OP and guess that triggers are involved?  Your crystal
> > ball must be working better than mine today.
>
> That is not what Mladen said or implied.  The intent here is to
> suggest that the OP possibly create a trigger to capture insert
> transactions into a separate table, with other information such as who
> did the insert and when, to track what is or isn't  happening.  There
> was no mention that the venedor is using triggers.
>
> David Fitzjarrell
Received on Fri Apr 29 2011 - 17:25:16 CDT