Re: ASM for single-instance 11g db server?
From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:15:33 +1000
Message-ID: <inhi0f$30m$1_at_dont-email.me>
Mladen Gogala wrote,on my timestamp of 5/04/2011 10:49 PM:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:14:34 +1000, Noons wrote:
>
>> Indeed. The only serious advantage I can see with ASM. Then again: how
>> many times in life does one need to transfer TB dbs from EMC to NetApp?
>
> Hmmm, I might need to do something like this soon. The company that I
> work for is using 3Par storage. HP bought 3Par and is now offering an EVA
> model as replacement. Depending on the outcome of the deal, I may have to
> move things around a bit. I was planning to use physical standby
> databases but now you got me interested. What provisions are there in ASM
> to do that? Can you give me some clues? How would I do that? Failure
> groups?
>
>
>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:15:33 +1000
Message-ID: <inhi0f$30m$1_at_dont-email.me>
Mladen Gogala wrote,on my timestamp of 5/04/2011 10:49 PM:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:14:34 +1000, Noons wrote:
>
>> Indeed. The only serious advantage I can see with ASM. Then again: how
>> many times in life does one need to transfer TB dbs from EMC to NetApp?
>
> Hmmm, I might need to do something like this soon. The company that I
> work for is using 3Par storage. HP bought 3Par and is now offering an EVA
> model as replacement. Depending on the outcome of the deal, I may have to
> move things around a bit. I was planning to use physical standby
> databases but now you got me interested. What provisions are there in ASM
> to do that? Can you give me some clues? How would I do that? Failure
> groups?
>
>
>
<pssst>look at Goldengate</pssst> Received on Wed Apr 06 2011 - 06:15:33 CDT