Re: ASM for single-instance 11g db server?
From: onedbguru <onedbguru_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b1afef44-43e1-4901-bdfe-e4eed6c12faa_at_l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
On Apr 5, 11:02 pm, Mladen Gogala <mgog..._at_no.address.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:50:55 -0700, onedbguru wrote:
> > one of the best things that impdp gave us was the ability to impdp via a
> > database link and "can be" easier than expdp, scp, impdp but you do have
> > the option.
>
> The problem was that the development department in India had a network
> problem and 30 people were using a single T1 line, with VPN encryption.
> Transfer of 400GB data over the network was out of the question. It was a
> sneaker net approach, this time with 0.5TB USB drive and UPS doing the
> "sneaker" part.
>
> --http://mgogala.byethost5.com
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b1afef44-43e1-4901-bdfe-e4eed6c12faa_at_l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
On Apr 5, 11:02 pm, Mladen Gogala <mgog..._at_no.address.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:50:55 -0700, onedbguru wrote:
> > one of the best things that impdp gave us was the ability to impdp via a
> > database link and "can be" easier than expdp, scp, impdp but you do have
> > the option.
>
> The problem was that the development department in India had a network
> problem and 30 people were using a single T1 line, with VPN encryption.
> Transfer of 400GB data over the network was out of the question. It was a
> sneaker net approach, this time with 0.5TB USB drive and UPS doing the
> "sneaker" part.
>
> --http://mgogala.byethost5.com
YIKES!!!! Received on Tue Apr 05 2011 - 22:36:36 CDT