Re: ASM for single-instance 11g db server?
From: Mladen Gogala <no_at_email.here.invalid>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:21:20 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2011.04.05.20.21.20_at_email.here.invalid>
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:14:34 +1000, Noons wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:21:20 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2011.04.05.20.21.20_at_email.here.invalid>
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:14:34 +1000, Noons wrote:
> Agreed 100%. Very much so. In fact, I am in the process of
> re-allocating all our databases to RAID5 in the new SAN, precisely
> because given two equal SAN/processor environments I can't prove to
> myself that RAID5 is inherently slower than RAID10.
Noons, that goes against the traditional lore. Do you have any numbers to back such claim up?
-- http://mgogala.byethost5.comReceived on Tue Apr 05 2011 - 15:21:20 CDT