Re: RAC question
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:19:35 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2011.03.13.18.14.37_at_gmail.com>
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:00:24 -0700, Steve Howard wrote:
>
> Hi Mladen,
>
> I am almost positive I did this (10.2.0.4 database managed by 11.2.0.2
> CRS) last September when I first tested 11.2.0.2. However, my notes
> from that testing aren't very good. However, I will be doing this again
> later this week, so this is a timely question.
>
> I will forward anything I do to you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:19:35 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2011.03.13.18.14.37_at_gmail.com>
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:00:24 -0700, Steve Howard wrote:
> On Mar 12, 11:05 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:57:54 -0800, onedbguru wrote: >> > It is my understanding that yes, you can use 11g grid+ASM with a 10g >> > RAC database. >> >> Excellent. That is my question. I tried unsuccessfully. I was able to >> get a single instance 10g to work, but it wouldn't start as a cluster >> instance. Did you do it and, if yes, how exactly is that done? That is >> what I am asking. >> >> --http://mgogala.byethost5.com
>
> Hi Mladen,
>
> I am almost positive I did this (10.2.0.4 database managed by 11.2.0.2
> CRS) last September when I first tested 11.2.0.2. However, my notes
> from that testing aren't very good. However, I will be doing this again
> later this week, so this is a timely question.
>
> I will forward anything I do to you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
Thanks, Steve. I will also be doing that this week. My CIO was nice enough to make necessary equipment available.
-- http://mgogala.byethost5.comReceived on Sun Mar 13 2011 - 13:19:35 CDT