Re: partitioned table-number of tablespaces (oracle 10g2)

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:10:10 +1100
Message-ID: <iehfn8$k0m$1_at_news.eternal-september.org>



Mladen Gogala wrote,on my timestamp of 18/12/2010 5:33 AM:

> queue and FIFO are the most frequent examples). The whole philosophy of
> "separating data to different disks" is as obsolete as the terminator
> model 1.

But you should hear the SAN vendors:
"Did you split your tables and indexes to different disks?" "Have you got any hot-tables? They need their own disk, you know?"

My usual reply:
"Did you learn to suck eggs recently?..." Received on Fri Dec 17 2010 - 23:10:10 CST

Original text of this message