Re: SQL query
From: gazzag <gareth_at_jamms.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <d947f099-5bc4-430c-8ee9-a5cdc7280aeb_at_g26g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
On Nov 26, 4:03 pm, The Boss <nlt..._at_baasbovenbaas.demon.nl> wrote:
> On Nov 25, 1:27 am, onedbguru <onedbg..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > So, this SQLquery went it a bar. After looking around, approached 2
> > tables and asked, "May I join you?...."
>
> I've analysed the statistics and they tell me that when offered such a
> query in a bar it is only natural to choose a hash joint path ...
>
> --
> Jeroen
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <d947f099-5bc4-430c-8ee9-a5cdc7280aeb_at_g26g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
On Nov 26, 4:03 pm, The Boss <nlt..._at_baasbovenbaas.demon.nl> wrote:
> On Nov 25, 1:27 am, onedbguru <onedbg..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > So, this SQLquery went it a bar. After looking around, approached 2
> > tables and asked, "May I join you?...."
>
> I've analysed the statistics and they tell me that when offered such a
> query in a bar it is only natural to choose a hash joint path ...
>
> --
> Jeroen
Just watch out that you don't end up consuming too many resources afterwards! :D Received on Mon Nov 29 2010 - 05:49:52 CST