Re: Any Experiences of 11r2 Win2k8R2

From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:29:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <59312f34-ff21-4840-8ce3-86f51d70f0dd_at_42g2000prt.googlegroups.com>



On Nov 10, 3:37 am, gazzag <gar..._at_jamms.org> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 8:48 pm, John Hurley <hurleyjo..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > What's Win2k8R2?  Windows 2000?  Maybe is there a windows 2008?
>
> Microsoft Windows 2008 Release 2.
>
> > Sorry you lost me here ...
>
> > Best advice is to not run Oracle on windows and go for real unix/linux
> > systems.
>
> Some of us dont' have any choice, sadly.  However, as much as I hate
> to admit it, Windows 2008 64-bit does resemble a real O/S!
>
> Mind you, why I still have to be warned "if you change a file name
> extension, the file may become unusable" or why I need a cute animated
> dog to help me "search" for files on a adult's operating system is
> beyond me!
>
> Possibly these things can be altered by changing system settings
> somewhere, but surely an enterprise server's O/S should be set to
> "adult" out of the box!

Now I have images of doggies doing "adult" things in my head.

I must say, I came to the conclusion long ago linux was incompatible with commercial interests - and certainly my personal desktop interests - but didn't really know if it was just me being a dinosaur and being wishful about all the effort being expended would be better spent on real unix. I feel validated with Mladen's "carnival of vanities" post.

I still find my own biases seem out of step with reality anyways. NT was VMS redux, Xenix --> SCO was a Bill Gates production, Larry and mysql... it's all wtf?

jg

--
_at_home.com is bogus.
If at first you don't succeed, feed 'em spam.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/09/navy-carrier-helps-stranded-cruise-ship-san-diego/
Maybe they should've airlifted in some street-taco vendors...
Received on Wed Nov 10 2010 - 12:29:12 CST

Original text of this message