Re: hardware binding
From: bdbafh <bdbafh_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <aab6c6a1-57b3-40fb-9ce3-001429391c17_at_x42g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 28, 1:46 am, "Jack" <n..._at_INVALIDmail.com> wrote:
> How can we do CPU hardware binding in vmware/win platform?
> (according oracle license agreement)
>
> Is someone running Oracle-databases on virtual-servers with hw-binding.
> What kind of experiences you have.
> Any specific issues.
>
> Or is real hardware server still better, opinions?
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <aab6c6a1-57b3-40fb-9ce3-001429391c17_at_x42g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 28, 1:46 am, "Jack" <n..._at_INVALIDmail.com> wrote:
> How can we do CPU hardware binding in vmware/win platform?
> (according oracle license agreement)
>
> Is someone running Oracle-databases on virtual-servers with hw-binding.
> What kind of experiences you have.
> Any specific issues.
>
> Or is real hardware server still better, opinions?
Not from personal experience, just from a simple search: http://wiki.oracle.com/page/Hard+partitioning
hth.
bdbafh Received on Wed Sep 29 2010 - 06:40:20 CDT