Is function index the best solution?
From: Robert Nicholson <robert.nicholson_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9804a980-d9e9-4596-b012-000159e1a7b6_at_i5g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
We have a query that uses the following style of query
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9804a980-d9e9-4596-b012-000159e1a7b6_at_i5g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
We have a query that uses the following style of query
WHERE TYPE in ('A','B') AND (ACCOUNT LIKE '%9999' OR ACCOUNT LIKE '%1111) AND TIME >= :1 AND TIME <= :2 order by TIME
...
right now this query tablescans
Is a function index using ACCOUNT the only way to avoid a tablescan?
There are indexes on account and the time columns but this query still performs a full tablescan.
Execution Statistics
Total Per Execution Per Row
executions 163 1 n/a Elapsed Time (sec) 12,932.65 79.34 n/a CPU Time (sec) 4,615.64 28.32 n/a Buffer Gets 198,614,100 1,218,491.41 n/a Disk Reads 63,106,576 387,156.91 n/a Direct Writes 0 0.00 n/a Rows 0 0.00 n/a Fetches 162 0.99 n/aReceived on Sun Sep 26 2010 - 20:46:39 CDT