Re: temp file useage on 10.2..0.4 enterprise database / windows 2003
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:33:36 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <i6qhvg$3ur$1_at_news.eternal-september.org>
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:04:06 -0700, ddf wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:33:36 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <i6qhvg$3ur$1_at_news.eternal-september.org>
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:04:06 -0700, ddf wrote:
> AFAIK that metric is not recorded in the AWR repository; it's reported
> from the v$tempseg_usage view.
Somewhat older, but practically completely table is V$SORT_USAGE. The obvious advantage of V$SORT_USAGE ove V$TEMPSEG_USAGE is the shorter name, thus cutting down on typing and the possibility of getting carpal tunnel.
SQL> desc v$tempseg_usage
Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------------- USERNAME VARCHAR2(30) USER VARCHAR2(30) SESSION_ADDR RAW(4) SESSION_NUM NUMBER SQLADDR RAW(4) SQLHASH NUMBER SQL_ID VARCHAR2(13) TABLESPACE VARCHAR2(31) CONTENTS VARCHAR2(9) SEGTYPE VARCHAR2(9) SEGFILE# NUMBER SEGBLK# NUMBER EXTENTS NUMBER BLOCKS NUMBER SEGRFNO# NUMBER SQL> desc v$sort_usage Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------------- USERNAME VARCHAR2(30) USER VARCHAR2(30) SESSION_ADDR RAW(4) SESSION_NUM NUMBER SQLADDR RAW(4) SQLHASH NUMBER SQL_ID VARCHAR2(13) TABLESPACE VARCHAR2(31) CONTENTS VARCHAR2(9) SEGTYPE VARCHAR2(9) SEGFILE# NUMBER SEGBLK# NUMBER EXTENTS NUMBER BLOCKS NUMBER SEGRFNO# NUMBER
SQL> If you take a more detailed look into v$tempseg_usage, you will discover that it is just a synonym for the view v_$sort_usage, just like v$sort_usage, which might explain why these two views look so similar. There is an obvious name change pending :)
-- http://mgogala.byethost5.comReceived on Wed Sep 15 2010 - 08:33:36 CDT