Re: known bugs in 10.2.0.1 on aix 64bit
From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d9e753c9-ac75-4e84-9159-28f2ac016627_at_v6g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 15, 11:45 am, Noons <wizofo..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 4:11 am, "Gerard H. Pille" <g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Any other reasons for leaving 10.2.0.1 behind are also very welcome. Should we go for 10.2.0.4
> > or 10.2.0.5 immediately?
>
> Dunno about those two, but I'm running 10.2.0.3 patched up and it is
> stable as a rock.
> However, I am not using ASSM. Nor RAC. Aix 64-bit 5L.
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d9e753c9-ac75-4e84-9159-28f2ac016627_at_v6g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 15, 11:45 am, Noons <wizofo..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 4:11 am, "Gerard H. Pille" <g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Any other reasons for leaving 10.2.0.1 behind are also very welcome. Should we go for 10.2.0.4
> > or 10.2.0.5 immediately?
>
> Dunno about those two, but I'm running 10.2.0.3 patched up and it is
> stable as a rock.
> However, I am not using ASSM. Nor RAC. Aix 64-bit 5L.
Apologies: we ARE using ASSM. What we are not using is ASM. Darn Oracle and their acronyms... Received on Wed Sep 15 2010 - 02:45:00 CDT