Re: Incompetent Oracle Support
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:46:47 +0530
Message-ID: <8bg56hFnlmU1_at_mid.individual.net>
Yes it was meant to be a soccer pun.
An did don't see where the discrimination lies.
In clear text:
I was stating that accepting a competitor's API as an industry standard
is akin of learning another language.
Adding an API (language) to ones skill set increases ones applicability
in the market and does not imply a technical (or cultural) defeat as was
alleged.
I'm sure Rolls Royce did not laugh when Ford and other non British companies built their first cars with a steering wheel on the right side.
What this does do is acknowledge that there is a major market using the API and the clear intent to attack that market.
I'm not even going to comment on this old same-code-base chestnut. It's getting truly lame.
As far as "dumping" is concerned I think it implies that you are selling under production cost. Germany has (had?) a similar law. If giving away the initial (as opposed to maintenance!) license of a software product would be illegal then presumably there is no legal mySQL in Australia or Germany?
Cheers
Serge
-- Serge Rielau SQL Architect DB2 for LUW IBM Toronto LabReceived on Fri Jul 30 2010 - 09:16:47 CDT