Re: So who is going to Open World 2010?
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <400f6637-70c4-4851-9277-4645f9d8171b_at_w37g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
On Jul 14, 2:58 am, gazzag <gar..._at_jamms.org> wrote:
> On 14 July, 10:40, Frank van Bortel <fbor..._at_home.nl> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm not, and am inclined to ask "So, who's reading this ng".
>
> I'm not going either. I'm still lurking around this newsgroup though.
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <400f6637-70c4-4851-9277-4645f9d8171b_at_w37g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
On Jul 14, 2:58 am, gazzag <gar..._at_jamms.org> wrote:
> On 14 July, 10:40, Frank van Bortel <fbor..._at_home.nl> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm not, and am inclined to ask "So, who's reading this ng".
>
> I'm not going either. I'm still lurking around this newsgroup though.
Not going.
>
> > It's so infested with spam these days, it's hardly worth
> > hanging in here.
>
> Agreed. What to do?
It reminds me of the scene in Close Encounters of the Third Kind where the computer takes over playing the music, and the communication slows and stops.
Somehow, Open World seems to have the same issue to me.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. "THE GRATEFUL DEA" - display on sat radio.Received on Fri Jul 16 2010 - 23:36:19 CDT