Re: snapshot too old error
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <26a04d8c-9f1e-47eb-9925-e78db1e5f60b_at_g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 3, 3:17 am, Noons <wizofo..._at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> John Hurley wrote,on my timestamp of 2/06/2010 9:38 PM:
>
> > Well actually some of the dinosaurs are running that release and
> > finding it pretty good. Some of the dinosaurs though actually do a
> > systematic job of planning and testing things.
>
> Or just plain do not stress out the relevant bits of code?
>
> > You have to remember the OP in this thread did not seem to know where
> > to find resources and information on snapshot too older ... so take
> > some of the complaints from the OP with a large degree of skepticism.
>
> Absolutely. They seem remarkably similar to what I've been seeing in the lists
> of fixed bugs in the patch releases, though...
>
> > There is a large difference between refusing to upgrade because one
> > has tested and found things in their environment and and their
> > applications which cause serious ( or critical ) errors and refusing
> > to upgrade just because something is new.
>
> Or refusing to upgrade because there is simply nothing in that release that is
> relevant to the applications being used? Or even supporting those applications?
>
> > Ya gotta remember that 11.1
>
> > has been out now for a pretty long time eh kimosabe?
>
> You gotta remember that 9.1 has been out for a pretty long time eh kimosabe?
>
> > We will be starting the phase of seriously checking out 11.2 just as
> > soon as the first patchset is available although it might be sooner.
>
> Good. Is the cost of that testing and the upgrades being accounted for to the
> business?
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <26a04d8c-9f1e-47eb-9925-e78db1e5f60b_at_g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 3, 3:17 am, Noons <wizofo..._at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> John Hurley wrote,on my timestamp of 2/06/2010 9:38 PM:
>
> > Well actually some of the dinosaurs are running that release and
> > finding it pretty good. Some of the dinosaurs though actually do a
> > systematic job of planning and testing things.
>
> Or just plain do not stress out the relevant bits of code?
>
> > You have to remember the OP in this thread did not seem to know where
> > to find resources and information on snapshot too older ... so take
> > some of the complaints from the OP with a large degree of skepticism.
>
> Absolutely. They seem remarkably similar to what I've been seeing in the lists
> of fixed bugs in the patch releases, though...
>
> > There is a large difference between refusing to upgrade because one
> > has tested and found things in their environment and and their
> > applications which cause serious ( or critical ) errors and refusing
> > to upgrade just because something is new.
>
> Or refusing to upgrade because there is simply nothing in that release that is
> relevant to the applications being used? Or even supporting those applications?
>
> > Ya gotta remember that 11.1
>
> > has been out now for a pretty long time eh kimosabe?
>
> You gotta remember that 9.1 has been out for a pretty long time eh kimosabe?
>
> > We will be starting the phase of seriously checking out 11.2 just as
> > soon as the first patchset is available although it might be sooner.
>
> Good. Is the cost of that testing and the upgrades being accounted for to the
> business?
Is the cost of being on an out of support release being accounted for to the business? eh kimo-sahib-bwanna-massa? :-) *
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. Wandered through my local Westfield Mall yesterday about 2:00PM. It was eerily like the old SNL routine with the dying mall, where the pet shop's puppies had puppies. * Reference from "Congress of Wonders" skit _The Stoned Ranger_ http://hedtke.blogspot.com/2009/07/congress-of-wonders.htmlReceived on Thu Jun 03 2010 - 12:56:58 CDT