Re: Off Topic: open source databases
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 01:34:19 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <htki6r$rdb$3_at_news.eternal-september.org>
On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:14:40 -0700, Steve Howard wrote:
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 01:34:19 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <htki6r$rdb$3_at_news.eternal-september.org>
On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:14:40 -0700, Steve Howard wrote:
> It's replacement in the world? I would guess MySQL, based on Oracle
> Corp.'s ownership if nothing else.
Hmmm, that doesn't compute, from my point of view. That is precisely why I opened this topic. Why would a huge corporation suddenly abandon its main cash cow in favor of a freebie? Slowly killing the freebie seems more likely to me, now that Oracle Corp. owns it. I am not sure as to why people are not trying to run away from MySQL, but they obviously are not.
-- http://mgogala.byethost5.comReceived on Wed May 26 2010 - 20:34:19 CDT