Re: DBMS_LDAP
From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:34:53 +0200
Message-ID: <9d967$4baf690b$524ba3af$5099_at_cache3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>
Bill wrote:
> Hi, yes it's a performance issue.
>
> Last year we hit max processes. This I believe was because it wasn't
> releasing the connections to AD fast enough.
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't get an opportunity at the time to see where
> the resources were being used, though our UNIX admin said there that
> from the OS point of view, most of the CPU was being used for the
> binding to AD accounts.
>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:34:53 +0200
Message-ID: <9d967$4baf690b$524ba3af$5099_at_cache3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>
Bill wrote:
> Hi, yes it's a performance issue.
>
> Last year we hit max processes. This I believe was because it wasn't
> releasing the connections to AD fast enough.
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't get an opportunity at the time to see where
> the resources were being used, though our UNIX admin said there that
> from the OS point of view, most of the CPU was being used for the
> binding to AD accounts.
>
Which were probably due to the number of sessions. Not running with
multiple dispatchers, are you?
If you were, one (of a few) dispatchers would handle all connections.
Now - every connection is a dedicated process
-- Regards, Frank van Bortel Topposting in Usenet groups I regard as offensive - I will not replyReceived on Sun Mar 28 2010 - 09:34:53 CDT