Re: LogMiner SESSION_INFO is empty
From: ddf <oratune_at_msn.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <74952cfd-6dcf-4be5-bc5d-e7298d55ec08_at_f17g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 16, 12:10 pm, andreik <spamme.andr..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 16, 5:01 pm, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 16, 11:33 am, andreik <spamme.andr..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi all,
>
> > > I'm trying to investigate a table drop using LogMiner.
>
> > > I can locate the needed SCN and can see the 'DROP' command in V
> > > $LOGMNR_CONTENTS along with some internal stuff in one transaction.
> > > But for some reason SESSION_INFO is missing for that transacation!
> > > Next transaction already comes with session_info. Also when I do a
> > > test drop now on the same database, I can nicely see myself in the
> > > SESSION_INFO. But for that old transaction SESSION_INFO is not
> > > displayed.
>
> > > Anyone has an idea how can I have SESSION_INFO retrieved for that
> > > transaction?
>
> > > 10.2.0.1 on Solaris 64bit
>
> > > thanks
>
> > SESSION_INFO isn't available for that transaction else you'd see it
> > displayed.
>
> > David Fitzjarrell
>
> so this is normal that session_info does not always get logged into
> redo?
> what does it depend on?
> is this mentioned somewhere in the documentation? I couldn't find
> anything like that.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <74952cfd-6dcf-4be5-bc5d-e7298d55ec08_at_f17g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 16, 12:10 pm, andreik <spamme.andr..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 16, 5:01 pm, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 16, 11:33 am, andreik <spamme.andr..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi all,
>
> > > I'm trying to investigate a table drop using LogMiner.
>
> > > I can locate the needed SCN and can see the 'DROP' command in V
> > > $LOGMNR_CONTENTS along with some internal stuff in one transaction.
> > > But for some reason SESSION_INFO is missing for that transacation!
> > > Next transaction already comes with session_info. Also when I do a
> > > test drop now on the same database, I can nicely see myself in the
> > > SESSION_INFO. But for that old transaction SESSION_INFO is not
> > > displayed.
>
> > > Anyone has an idea how can I have SESSION_INFO retrieved for that
> > > transaction?
>
> > > 10.2.0.1 on Solaris 64bit
>
> > > thanks
>
> > SESSION_INFO isn't available for that transaction else you'd see it
> > displayed.
>
> > David Fitzjarrell
>
> so this is normal that session_info does not always get logged into
> redo?
> what does it depend on?
> is this mentioned somewhere in the documentation? I couldn't find
> anything like that.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Apparently supplemtal logging wasn't enabled at the time the suspect transaction took place as this is required to populate session_info data in the redo logs.
David Fitzjarrell Received on Tue Mar 16 2010 - 12:00:59 CDT