Re: The penny hasn't dropped yet...
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:22:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <77ad5bb2-8e83-46ce-a31e-0eafca89edda_at_q2g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 4, 6:52 pm, Noons <wizofo..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 12:51 am, John Hurley <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:22:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <77ad5bb2-8e83-46ce-a31e-0eafca89edda_at_q2g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 4, 6:52 pm, Noons <wizofo..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 12:51 am, John Hurley <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Oracle used to sell separate upgrade licensing and support licensing,
> back in the pre-6 days.
> Guess why they bundled both into a single licence? ;)
> I wonder if anyone ever tested the legality under common law of them
> doing so...
Which law would that be?
http://www.ipinfoblog.com/archives/licensing-law-issues-flawed-ali-software-contract-principles.html
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. http://www.krebsonsecurity.com/2010/03/mariposa-botnet-authors-may-avoid-jail-time/Received on Fri Mar 05 2010 - 11:22:44 CST