Re: Oracle does it again
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:52:36 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 26, 3:28 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes it is better. This is all I was able to get. There is a recession
> out there. It doesn't have anything to do with the fact that Oracle
> 11.2.0 RAC demands at least one more IP which is as stupid as it gets.
> A free IP address is not a small thing to demand and yet nobody has
> been informing the (l)users of that fact. Requesting an additional
> significant resource without telling anyone is actually as enraging as
> the recent Metalink "upgrade".
Getting one more IP address is a significant problem? I am just not understanding why that might pose such a problem.
I guess you could file a bug report on this and see where you get.
As people discover what is required relevant to an 11.2 upgrade it seems like it will fall into a planning process. Maybe you are out there on the early discovery path blazing a trail for other people here.
Do you really need RAC? What approach exactly would you have recommended Oracle to follow in warning people that they would be needing this significant item? Received on Fri Feb 26 2010 - 17:52:36 CST