Re: find position of row in set of rows
From: Mladen Gogala <no_at_email.here.invalid>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:58:15 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2010.01.29.19.58.15_at_email.here.invalid>
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:01:18 +0100, Robert Klemme wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:58:15 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2010.01.29.19.58.15_at_email.here.invalid>
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:01:18 +0100, Robert Klemme wrote:
> I don't fully agree: certainly relational DB and SQL started out at
> relational algebra, but there are significant features (even in standard
> SQL) that are not really covered by set theory (just to name ORDER BY
> and the Oracle specific CONNECT BY).
That is because of the infidels who have polluted our, otherwise pure, mathematical theory. That's nothing that a good jihad couldn't sort out. Kantor, Zermelo and Goedel must be turning in their graves.
-- http://mgogala.byethost5.comReceived on Fri Jan 29 2010 - 13:58:15 CST