Re: Replication
From: The Magnet <art_at_unsu.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <59d06b82-5791-4538-82d7-975d6e14d424_at_31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 15, 8:02 pm, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 7:15 pm, The Magnet <a..._at_unsu.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm trying to learn about this Advanced Replication. I've already got
> > a headache. Trying to understand these replication groups and master
> > groups and materialized view sites from master group sites, etc. I
> > just do not get it.
>
> > But anyways, my question is this: I read that you can have a
> > asynchronous replication but you can simulate continuous pushing of
> > transactions. Why not use synchronous then? Or I I totally lost?
>
> > Thanks!
>
> Not to be contrary but you should probably shift over to reading about
> Streams replication as the old Advanced Replcation is outdated.
>
> David Fitzjarrell
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <59d06b82-5791-4538-82d7-975d6e14d424_at_31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 15, 8:02 pm, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 7:15 pm, The Magnet <a..._at_unsu.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm trying to learn about this Advanced Replication. I've already got
> > a headache. Trying to understand these replication groups and master
> > groups and materialized view sites from master group sites, etc. I
> > just do not get it.
>
> > But anyways, my question is this: I read that you can have a
> > asynchronous replication but you can simulate continuous pushing of
> > transactions. Why not use synchronous then? Or I I totally lost?
>
> > Thanks!
>
> Not to be contrary but you should probably shift over to reading about
> Streams replication as the old Advanced Replcation is outdated.
>
> David Fitzjarrell
Will look into it, easier to understand I hope, and better with 10g I hope too..... Received on Tue Sep 15 2009 - 20:36:23 CDT