Re: Does this look like a bug? Test case enclosed ...
From: John Hurley <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <64cef7f5-40db-4647-804e-c12c8cfe2021_at_18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
On Aug 27, 9:36 am, Mark D Powell <Mark.Pow..._at_eds.com> wrote:
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <64cef7f5-40db-4647-804e-c12c8cfe2021_at_18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
On Aug 27, 9:36 am, Mark D Powell <Mark.Pow..._at_eds.com> wrote:
snip
> The following does not directly apply to the observation but with 11g
> you should use get_prefs instead of get_parms which has been
> obsoleted.
No such thing as get_parms in dbms_stats ... plus "you should use" is perhaps overstated but might be "you could use". Received on Thu Aug 27 2009 - 09:59:18 CDT