Re: Getting a consistent copy

From: Pat <pat.casey_at_service-now.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <404164a9-6d47-4b5a-b84a-f99489e72678_at_u38g2000pro.googlegroups.com>



On Jul 20, 5:00 pm, John Hurley <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Jul 20, 1:09 pm, Pat <pat.ca..._at_service-now.com> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> > One thing we're considering trying here to achieve the same thing
> > though is to use SAN snapshotting, something like this:
>
> > 1) Leave the source running
> > 2) SNAP /u01 on the san
> > 3) Mount the SNAP on a different database server in read/write mode
> > 4) Restart Oracle over there
> > 5) Let it go through a recovery (since we did just crash it)
> > 6) Run a data pump export out of there.
>
> > Is anybody doing something like this? Does anybody know of any
> > subtleties that I should be aware of? In theory the above should work
> > fine, but as one of my colleagues is fond of pointing out, in theory
> > you shouldn't need practise.
>
> Yup doing this all the time ... we are using EMC on Clariions ... and
> using a clone ( full copy ) not a snap ... but same basic thing.
>
> Yes there was at least poster noting that this technique failed for
> them on extremely high volume transactions rate systems.  I haven't
> seen it fail on any of the systems I have worked on.
>
> We use this technique to refresh a test and/or dev database with fresh
> data.  Usually we also get a local clone of the refreshed database so
> that it can be restored multiple times to the same starting point
> ( groundhog day ) in a testing loop.

Thanks, that's exactly what I needed to hear.

We're on netapp, not EMC, but same basic feature set for this sort of thing.

Appreciate the feedback,

  • Pat
Received on Mon Jul 20 2009 - 19:19:04 CDT

Original text of this message