Re: Version blues
From: Shakespeare <whatsin_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:10:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4a29438f$0$186$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Mark D Powell schreef:
> On Jun 5, 9:09 am, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_bogus.email.com>
> wrote:
>
> I read that the benchmark requires the code be "production" or that
> the production date be given. The note stated the date listed was Dec
> 1. It did not mention a year but I would guess is is 2009.
>
> HTH -- Mark D Powell --
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:10:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4a29438f$0$186$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Mark D Powell schreef:
> On Jun 5, 9:09 am, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_bogus.email.com>
> wrote:
>> Oracle and HP have recently performed some benchmark testing of blade server >> RAC, in combination with Exadata storage servers. The combination, of course, >> topped the chart, as can be seen here: >> >> http://structureddata.org/2009/06/03/oracle-and-hp-take-back-1-spot-f... >> >> The funy thing here is that the database used was Oracle RDBMS 11g RELEASE 2. >> RELEASE 2??? Is it for benchmark purposes only or will there be something for >> the general population? >> >> --http://mgogala.freehostia.com
>
> I read that the benchmark requires the code be "production" or that
> the production date be given. The note stated the date listed was Dec
> 1. It did not mention a year but I would guess is is 2009.
>
> HTH -- Mark D Powell --
Sadly enough, the number 1 is more than 5 times as expensive as number 2...... to be only 15% faster (measured in QphH)
Shakespeare Received on Fri Jun 05 2009 - 11:10:51 CDT