Re: Version blues
From: Mark D Powell <Mark.Powell_at_eds.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 06:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a38745f4-1a82-445a-b502-37f5793bd5e6_at_z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 5, 9:09 am, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_bogus.email.com> wrote:
> Oracle and HP have recently performed some benchmark testing of blade server
> RAC, in combination with Exadata storage servers. The combination, of course,
> topped the chart, as can be seen here:
>
> http://structureddata.org/2009/06/03/oracle-and-hp-take-back-1-spot-f...
>
> The funy thing here is that the database used was Oracle RDBMS 11g RELEASE 2.
> RELEASE 2??? Is it for benchmark purposes only or will there be something for
> the general population?
>
> --http://mgogala.freehostia.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 06:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a38745f4-1a82-445a-b502-37f5793bd5e6_at_z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 5, 9:09 am, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla..._at_bogus.email.com> wrote:
> Oracle and HP have recently performed some benchmark testing of blade server
> RAC, in combination with Exadata storage servers. The combination, of course,
> topped the chart, as can be seen here:
>
> http://structureddata.org/2009/06/03/oracle-and-hp-take-back-1-spot-f...
>
> The funy thing here is that the database used was Oracle RDBMS 11g RELEASE 2.
> RELEASE 2??? Is it for benchmark purposes only or will there be something for
> the general population?
>
> --http://mgogala.freehostia.com
I read that the benchmark requires the code be "production" or that the production date be given. The note stated the date listed was Dec 1. It did not mention a year but I would guess is is 2009.
HTH -- Mark D Powell -- Received on Fri Jun 05 2009 - 08:50:44 CDT